Generative AI Maturity Assessment Test

You will receive a custom report on this email ID along with the next steps to enhance your GenAI capabilities. View our privacy policy.

Start your GenAI assessment

Strategic Alignment and Accountability

Alignment of your organization’s AI adoption with business goals, leadership structure and partnerships.

1. Alignment of AI vision to business strategy:
Our organization has a clearly defined strategy for AI adoption that is directly aligned with our business objectives.
Our AI adoption strategy is loosely connected to our business goals and requires further refinement.
There is no clear alignment between our AI adoption strategy and our overarching business strategy.

2. Leadership structure for driving AI initiatives:
We have a dedicated AI leadership team with clear decision-making authority and executive sponsorship.
We have identified an AI champion, but there is no formal leadership structure or governance framework in place.
AI initiatives are currently managed on an ad-hoc basis without defined leadership or governance.

3. Partnership for Generative AI infrastructure and expertise:
We actively partner with leading technology vendors and hyperscalers to leverage their infrastructure and expertise for our generative AI initiatives.
We are considering partnerships with tech vendors or hyperscalers to address potential infrastructure limitations for generative AI.
We are currently managing generative AI infrastructure needs internally and have not explored external partnerships.

Budget Allocation and Use Case Prioritization

Budgeting practices for AI projects, identification of high-impact use cases and infrastructure readiness for generative AI.

4. Prioritization of AI initiatives and budget allocation:
We have a dedicated budget for AI initiatives with ROI driven prioritization, facilitated by strong collaboration between business and technology teams.
Budget allocation for AI is ad-hoc and lacks a clear prioritization framework that balances strategic objectives with potential ROI. while some AI initiatives are pursued, the process for identifying and funding use cases is fluid.
There is no specific budget allocated for AI initiatives; funding is obtained on a case-by-case basis. This makes it difficult to pursue strategic AI projects and may lead to missed opportunities.

5. Prioritization of AI use cases while ensuring high ROI:
We have a comprehensive list of high-impact use cases identified across various business functions.
Some potential use cases have been identified, but they are in early stages or limited to pilot projects.
There is a lack of clear use cases or a roadmap for AI implementation within our organization.

6. Infrastructure and data readiness for implementing GEN AI use cases:
Our infrastructure is fully scalable and adaptable to support a wide range of GEN AI use cases.
We have a functional infrastructure for AI implementation, but it may require upgrades or adjustments to handle complex GEN AI workloads.
Our existing infrastructure is limited and may require significant investment to be AI-ready.

Data Quality and Management

Quality, accessibility, and scalability of your data infrastructure for AI development and deployment.

7. Evaluating data quality and accessibility for AI implementation:
We have high-quality, well-organized data readily accessible for AI training and analysis.
Data quality varies, requiring significant cleaning and preprocessing before use in AI applications.
Data availability is limited or fragmented, often hindering AI development and analysis.

8. Scalability and integration capabilities of IT infrastructure for AI applications:
Our IT infrastructure is scalable and well-integrated, capable of supporting large-scale AI applications.
Some upgrades are needed to enhance the scalability and integration of our IT infrastructure for AI.
Our current IT infrastructure lacks the scalability and integration required for AI applications.

9. Approach to risk assessment and mitigation in AI projects:
We have established processes for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with AI adoption.
Risk assessment is conducted on a project-by-project basis, lacking a systematic approach.
There is little to no consideration given to risk assessment and mitigation in AI projects.

Skills Development and Acquisition

Your organization's talent pool for AI skills, investment in training and development programs, and strategies for attracting and retaining AI talent.

10. Investment in AI talent development and continuous learning:
We have dedicated programs for AI skill development, including training, workshops, and mentorship opportunities.
AI skill development is ad-hoc, with limited investment in training and professional development.
There are no formal initiatives for AI talent development within our organization.

11. Mechanisms for attracting and retaining AI talent:
We offer competitive compensation packages and career advancement opportunities to attract and retain top AI talent.
Our organization struggles to attract and retain AI talent due to limited incentives and career growth prospects.
There are no specific strategies in place for attracting or retaining AI talent within our organization.

12. Evolution of learning and development program for Gen AI implementation
Our Learning and Development (L&D) programs have been comprehensively revamped to equip employees with the necessary skills for working with Generative AI.
We are currently in the process of adapting our L&D programs to address the specific skill sets required for Generative AI adoption.
Our L&D programs haven\'t yet been modified to specifically address the skills needed for using Generative AI.

Bias, Ethics, & Robustness

Your organization's approach to addressing fairness, transparency, and ethical considerations in AI development.

13. Ensuring fairness and transparency in AI decision-making processes:
We have implemented measures to detect and mitigate bias in AI models, prioritizing fairness and transparency.
Fairness and transparency are considered in AI development, but there is room for improvement in implementation.
There is little to no consideration given to fairness and transparency in AI decision-making processes.

14. Steps to address ethical concerns and societal implications of AI deployment:
We have established ethical guidelines and frameworks for AI deployment, addressing societal implications and ethical considerations.
Ethical concerns are acknowledged, but there is limited action taken to address them systematically.
There are no formalized processes in place to address ethical concerns or societal implications of AI deployment.

15. Effectiveness in handling unexpected changes in data volume, schema, or quality issues after deploying AI solutions:
Our data pipelines are robust and can adapt to most unexpected changes in data volume, schema, and quality.
We encounter occasional challenges with managing unexpected data changes post-deployment, requiring manual intervention.
Our data pipelines struggle to handle significant changes in data post-deployment, leading to disruptions in AI operations.

By Function

By Industry

tabbing-section

Generative AI Maturity Assessment Test

What we do

By Function

By Industry

Insights

Company

Copyright © 2023 Sigmoid- A Streamvector Company | All Rights Reserved